User login

Syndicate

XML feed

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 64 guests online.

Poll

What Is Your Trump Card World View?
Secular Humanist
0%
Cosmic Humanist
0%
Biblical Christian
0%
Hedonist
0%
Aristotelian
100%
Total votes: 2

5 Tips to Focusing on The Good Life

Submitted by seth on January 14, 2006 - 6:03pm.

I think most of us spend the majority of our time trying to figure out how to make money and secure financial independence. I spend probably 75% of all working time strictly on that point. It seems a little ridiculous considering how little reward money has in and of itself. I think my reasoning for justifying the time it cost to pursue financial goals is that money is the facilitator of a lot of my other goals in life.

When I sit down and dream about what I really want out of life I can’t help but to go back to the question of how I can obtain that goal without making money. Sometimes I find that I don’t need to be wealthy to pursue the goal. However, more often than not I am left feeling ill equipped to advance many of my dreams until I am financially independent. Money seems to be the rarely conquered obstacle that stands in my way of obtaining the good life.

Lest you think that my priorities are completely out of whack, I have little or no desire for a new car, bigger house, or even a fancy watch. (I have to admit I really want a cool laptop though). I don’t need that stuff (except for the laptop). Sure I’ll take it and be very grateful if somebody gives me that kind of stuff but it doesn’t get me excited about life. It doesn’t make me say that life is great. Actually, I feel kind of selfish when I consume too much. That too much is a pretty slippery argument because everyone is going to slice "too much"? differently. As a matter of fact I will write an article just about that so that I don’t have to address it here.

When I think about the good life I think of how I can improve other people’s quality of life. I want to start youth programs. I want to finance struggling businesses in Latin America. I want to educate and inspire more people to look towards the Liberal Arts to help define what the good life is. I want to contribute to other people’s ability to be self-employed. I believe that affecting other people’s happiness is the most effective way that I can feel content. Maybe I am way too idealistic. Maybe its even paradoxical to rely on other people’s happiness to find happiness for myself. This is another point that deserves its own article. Suffice it to say that I think that attempting to contribute to other people’s happiness is all that I can expect from myself. I can’t really expect people to always benefit from my efforts. The attempt to help is in itself satisfying.

There are a lot of areas of happiness for me. Those are just some of the big ones. I also want to be a scholar. I want to be a published author. I want to be genuinely interested in every person I meet. I have all kinds of personal goals that contribute to my well-being. These personal accomplishments rely less heavily on financial prosperity to execute successfully. This kind of success also plays a major role in my ability to help other people independent of material resources.

Perhaps this kind of success is also the path to which temporal prosperity comes. The more I develop myself to become more scholarly, a more effective writer, and a more authentic salesperson, the more financially independent I become also. Perhaps in pursuing finances before other areas of personal development I am putting the cart before the horse.
Here are 5 things that I am finding helpful to fight the urge to invest too heavily in my financial prosperity at the expense of other worthy and necessary personal development goals:

1. I wake up early and go to bed at a pre-scheduled time. The early pre-sunrise part of the morning has given me the ability to re-work my life goals and short term goals daily. The peace in the early morning provides me with an opportunity to focus in on the things that really appear to be the most important. Every day I ask myself: What am I going to do in life? What am I going to do to make my family happy? What am I going to do to make my wife happy? What am I going to do to make me happy? What causes will I participate in that are larger than myself? What will make this world a better place for my children?

2. I schedule. I handwrite my schedule in a calendar book. I determine how each 30 minute block of my time is going to be used. If it only has "make money"? events then I make sure to clear a window to go to a library for an hour that day. I also schedule time to write, play with my kids, do the dishes for my wife, and down time to read. I make sure that my calendar has enough items that plug into accomplishing a larger goal. Knowing that I am doing things daily that contribute to my larger objectives, gives me a real sense of daily satisfaction. By the end of my morning calendaring I feel satisfied and look forward to the rewards that wait me after I am done with my money making activities. Some people feel that money-making activities are the most satisfying. Lucky them. I really need other rewards which motivate me to continue working for money.

3. I make a point of keeping in contact with my friends and mentors on a frequent basis. I don’t have tons of friends who inspire me. However, I do have a handful of them. Each friend and mentor inspires me differently. I have a friend who shares my love for philosophy. His political views are quite controversial but very well constructed. He is a thorough thinker and I call him weekly just to debate him about the things which we disagree and agree. We do it as a mental exercise and it is one of the most exhilarating weekly conversations that I have. I have a couple of other friends with whom I discuss books. Each month we agree to read a book relevant to Latin America and we hold a phone conference to discuss our thoughts. My friends refine my thoughts and inspire me to keep pace with their intellectual curiosities. I could go on and on about the different phone calls that I make to friends. Friendships play a substantial role in my happiness and my friends often remind me of how rich life is outside financial pursuits.

4. I write down my thoughts. I carry a pocket sized notebook. Sometimes I see things that amuse or inspire me. I take a moment to write them down. Writing in my notebook helps sort out my thoughts. I make sense of my feelings too. I write poetry or I complain about something. Whatever I am feeling, I try to write it down. Writing things down have other benefits. I am exercising my writing skills. I am remaining more connected to the human experience. When I don’t write things down I tend to disconnect and become more and more alienated from my good relationships. Writing things down gives me a lot more to talk about later. I can’t write a list about how to stay clear about "the good"? without discussing the value of journaling my thoughts.

5. I pray. Some people don’t believe in anything higher than themselves. Not me. I believe that I am not very significant in the grand scheme of things and I ask God to accompany me in all that I do. Recognizing God as the granter of all good things, gives me an assurance that something larger than myself is on my side to help me accomplish great things. Take it for what its worth but I don’t feel any kind of peace or clarity about my life purpose when I ignore prayer.



Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on January 15, 2006 - 10:57pm.

Liberal arts education SUCKS big time. You, Sir, are an idiot.

Submitted by seth on January 16, 2006 - 12:34pm.

super funny comment. sounds like you passionately disagree. you might convince somebody if you give a reason for your disagreement. how can it possibly be detrimental to happiness to educate yourelf in the liberal arts? its ridiculous to say that liberal arts "suck". come on bro, think a little.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on January 19, 2006 - 5:57pm.

It seems pointless to argue with someone who uses "bro" as a pronoun. Why anyone would want to study liberal arts in this day and age is beyond me. I suppose most would look and say, "What value does a liberal arts education offer?" The world is moving on, evidenced by the majority of jobs in the world being technology driven. I have known a great many liberal art majors in my time, and not one of them has ever gone on to any sort of successful career. To be honest, I think if we look at those who study the liberal arts, we would see a much higher rate of failure and bankruptcy than that of those who study more technical fields. This may come as a shock, but it's true. In its very roots, higher education was a leisurely pursuit for intellectuals among the elite. No one had time to bother with such luxuries as philosophizing: They were too busy making a living. Education was a frivolous pastime of the impractical; hence the term "Liberal arts." And thus it remains today. I notice from your previous posts that you are a realtor. My guess is that you recieved your liberal arts degree, went to grauate school for something like Art Appreciation or Sociology and found that it did not provide for your family. Sure, you can now analyze your poverty for hours on end thanks to your so called education, but an investment in an actual technical field, like Chemistry, Engineering, etc. would have likely proved more fruitful financially. Here's to reconsidering your "education"... bro.

Submitted by seth on January 20, 2006 - 1:13am.

i am glad to see that you came back to argue your point. we are always up for a good debate. if i understand your argument right, you define the merits of an education basically by how much a degree is worth. even though my view never claims to say that everyone should get a liberal arts degree, i will address the merits of the degree in and of themselves. just for the record, my opinion is that everyone will benefit from continuing their liberal arts education (not degree). once someone has trained themselves in whatever vocational training they see fit, there is a great need to spend the rest of their lives, at least in part, reading and studying the liberal arts. the benefits of the liberal arts contribute to a much greater study of what life is all about than do books that solely address how to make money. it seems impossible to define success with out including some of the areas which the liberal arts teach us. like understanding relationships, defining good and bad, and remembering our ancestors sacrifices to better our lives. i could go on forever about how liberal arts enhances our ability to comprehend the human experience. it is a study that can't possibly hurt any person alive. more boldly, it will improve the happiness of every person who studies them.

your argument agrees with some of the research made about what bachelor degrees represent the most and least income like the national center for education statistics http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d03/tables/dt387.asp
or cnn's online money magazine http://money.cnn.com/2004/09/21/pf/college/starting_salaries/

the problem you are addressing is still a very oversimplistic view of how liberal arts affects someone's ability to make money. i would be interested to see the proportion of successful entrepreneurs with a liberal arts interest to those who don't. or if you wanted to base the degrees off of the post undergrad merits then you still might need to consider the higher success rate at which liberal arts undergrads seem to outperform more narrow focused technology degrees when entering into professional higher education fields. such as m.d, mba, and jd. each school reports it differently, however, the reports support the fact that liberal arts under grads consistently perform at a higher level than do their vocationally trained counterparts.

more to the point, however, is the fact that i never pretended to argue which degree an undergraduate student should pursue. i have a brother in law who only has an associates degree but obtained it just at the right time in ultrasound diagnostics and earns 100k a year. as far as i am concerned he got alot of bang for his vocational degree. even though he is thriving financially, he admits that he really longs for more liberal arts background.

why? because he, like many other vocationally trained employees define success and quality of life much more broadly than income earning potential. he believes that the liberal arts would more effecively teach his children about morality. he relies heavily on his limited exposure to the liberal arts to find meaning in life. meaning that is very shallow from an ultrasound perspective. sure you are saving lives, but for what? money, a practical degree, to support your family? the more you ask yourself what the end you are pursuing is the more you begin to realize how much your liberal arts education can help you answer that question.

again, i don't intend to persuade anyone to change their major in college. however, a liberal arts education is an education that will more adequately address all of the other questions you have in life that don't concern themselves directly with how to make money. by all means pursue whatever education you feel is going to net you the most cash. i suggest that when you do or do not succeed in obtaining your goal of money. you should rely on the liberal arts to help you satisfactorily allocate it in the case that you succeed. and the liberal arts if you don't succeed, can help you cope with your failure. liberal arts is certainly a much more satisfactory and practical post graduate pursuit of knowledge than any other field of study. once in a career, what do you intend to study for the rest of your life. if liberal arts aren't part of your continued education, then do society a favor and don't marry or have kids. because you are effectively transitioning into a machine. liberal arts reminds you what it means to be human. it helps you connect with the human experience and it helps you make sense of all of the humdrum associated with being an engineer to make money. life without liberal arts is the most useless way to live because you are only living for the most superficial things imaginable. money and status. crazy how quickly that becomes unfulfilling.

by the way, i don't know how you came to the conclusion that i'm a realtor, i'm not...i'm am a closer for real estate investors. its ok if you don't see the difference. i just know it bugs vocationally educated people when they are lacking precision.

Submitted by Ben on January 21, 2006 - 12:53am.

benreedjohnson
Who cares what one majors in. The whole point of the topic was to say that the pursuit of money is foolish when it becomes the center of your life. It's unfortunate to go through life with such tunnel visioned thinking. Am I credible in saying this? I think so. I have a B.S. in Biology which I earned by taking only the required liberal art class (1) I had to. My brain is not hard wired for art, sociology, or philosophy classes. I like to walk through an art gallery every now and then, I watch the History channel, but you'll never catch me wanting to take a liberal arts class. So what? I can appreciate those that want to. That makes me 100x better than a millionaire engineer who is so self centered he can't understand why anyone would want to take such 'obviously stupid classes'. Anonymous has no class and small character. What would I know though, I only have a science degree. Touche.

Submitted by brian on January 22, 2006 - 1:21pm.

There is a wide spectrum of financially successful people that I run into daily in my profession. However, just this week I met a developer that stood out in a way that relates to the previous comments. From our casual discussion I found out that his educational background was your typical MBA experience. However, what was most impressive was the way he used an interest in liberal arts to inspire and innovate his business decisions. He is extremely knowledgeable of the history of numerous civilizations. He also understands the socioeconomic evolutions that have taken place all over the globe at various times in history. I was amazed by the amount of specific knowledge he had of the evolving cultural ‘heart’ of urbanization and how it differs along ethnic and geographic lines. It was evident that he had studied, on his own, history, philosophy, and sociology. With this knowledge, he tries to place a culturally based building or space in every development, sometimes with his own money. Over the years he would adjust the type of cultural element according to the current evolutions of our society. He mentioned that the developments with the cultural ‘hearts’ consistently produce more profits and public popularity than others. He understood that if you learn from the past and develop based on failures and successes of history you will produce a situation that will thrive. While this may have cost his business at first, the long term benefits have catapulted his company to the forefront of high-end development. You have to know what the typical developer is like to truly appreciate how unique this person is. Most developers are concerned about the bottom line, and how easily, quickly, and cheaply they can maximize the bottom line (take a look at your local strip mall). This is what they learn in business school and in the field. While at risk of stereotyping, most developers don’t care what they are giving back to the community nor do they understand the opportunity they have to ‘change’ the world while making huge profits. This unique developer was able to draw on other fields of study to enhance his true passion. I think everyone can find this to be true to their profession and passions. I have found it to be true with my career in architecture. Sociology, psychology, history, literature, and many other “non-architectural� fields of study are just as crucial to my work as my architecture degrees. True knowledge is a general understanding of many fields of study and how they relate to each other, while true wisdom comes with experience in practicing the knowledge of many fields of study to maximize the your effectiveness in a particular task.

Submitted by seth on January 25, 2006 - 2:20pm.

this is a long semi-academic article. but it is definetely worth the read. very relevant to this debate.

read the pdf version here

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Glossary terms will be automatically marked with links to their descriptions